Skip to content Skip to footer
News

Just following orders? Obedient zombies in the spotlight

15 September 2014

One of history’s most iconic social psychology experiments may have been completely misinterpreted, according to a University of Queensland researcher.

Stanley Milgram’s studies on obedience are widely understood to demonstrate people’s natural inclination to obey orders from those in authority, without question.

UQ School of Psychology researcher Professor Alex Haslam suggests it is not blind obedience that drives people to engage in harmful behaviour, but rather a sense that they are part of a worthwhile project for greater good.

“We found that when it comes to harming others, people are not zombies who follow orders without thinking,” Professor Haslam said.

“They make active choices on the basis of appeals to objectives that they see as valuable and important.”

Milgram’s study demonstrated that members of the public were willing to administer apparently lethal electrical shocks to a stranger because they were asked to by an experimenter.

The 50-year-old study could not be replicated today as it would not pass ethical guidelines.

The contemporary study involved participants facing a choice of five negative adjectives to describe images of groups of people.

These groups became increasingly more appealing across a series of 30 trials

As participants began to falter in the task of describing a positive group in negative terms, they were given instructions or “prods” from of Milgram’s original experiment. 

“The most basic of these prods asked them to ‘please continue’, another told them ‘the experiment requires that you continue’, and finally they were told ‘you have no other choice, you must continue’,” Professor Haslam said.

He said the key question was whether participants would be more likely to continue when the experimenter appealed to the study’s scientific goals or when he issued an order to continue.

“In line with our theorizing, the results showed that the most successful instruction wasn’t an order, but rather an appeal to advance what they saw as a valued scientific enterprise,” Professor Haslam said.

The study, published in the Journal of Social Issues, was a joint project between Professor Haslam, Professor Stephen Reicher at the University of St Andrews and Dr Megan Birney at the University of Exeter.  

Media: UQ Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences Senior Marketing and Communications Officer Helen Burdon, 07 3365 7436 or 0412 744 437, h.burdon@uq.edu.au.

Related articles

A student walks through the cloisters at UQ

UQ’s QARC wins at Engagement Australia Awards

UQ’s Queensland Aphasia Research Centre (QARC) has won the Outstanding Engagement for Research Impact award at the 2026 Engagement Australia Excellence Awards.
12 November 2026
Two researchers wearing white University of Queensland and QAAFI laboratory coats stand behind a stainless-steel bench displaying multiple glasses of pale wine and three bottles. The researchers are positioned in a bright laboratory with large windows in the background. Tasting glasses are arranged on white trays, suggesting sensory evaluation or beverage research. The polished bench reflects the bottles and glasses, while University of Queensland and Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation

White wine drinkers help pinpoint what’s missing in no and low alcohol drinks

Researchers at The University of Queensland are on a quest to identify key aroma compounds that could make no and low-alcohol (NOLO) wine more attractive to drinkers.
12 November 2026

Media contact

Subscribe to UQ News

Get the latest from our newsroom.